As I'm getting this blog up to speed, I will be posting a few articles that I have written in the past.
First up is an article I wrote for the Cincinnati Enquirer back in January 2004 in response to the University of Cincinnati raising tuition at a time when student applications are down. This article is no longer to be found online, so here it is again. This is my first published piece that relates to The Challenge Dividend.
UC has a perfect chance for
reform
Your voice: Bob Gilbreath
Last week, four months into
her term as University of Cincinnati president, Nancy Zimpher declared
"an economic near-perfect storm." Editorials called for more state
funding, and university officials planned a 9.9 percent tuition hike. While challenging,
this could be the pressure needed for Zimpher to revamp the school to meet
economic realities.
Two facts are particularly
disturbing for UC. First, the state has reduced funding by almost $1,000 per
student since 2001, but tuition at UC is up from $4,998 to $7,623, a net $1,500
increase. Second, UC is experiencing a decade-long "enrollment
shortfall." UC is reacting to less student interest by increasing prices
for those who do attend.
Imagine if any other
business decided to raise prices in response to falling market share. It would
not last long. This points out the central problem in university economics: It
is not a free market that compels innovation and efficiency.
Remarkably, government aid
aimed at making college affordable actually drives costs up and insulates
universities from market pressure to improve. In a recent study, Bridget Terry
Long of Harvard University found that a 1997 federal tax
credit for college ($4.5 billion in 2000 alone) did nothing to boost
middle-class enrollment, but did spur accelerated tuition hikes.
These increases have
supported inefficient expansion. Sprawling sports complexes and niche academic
departments stand as monuments to unrestrained spending. Such expansion creates
new bureaucracies fighting for funding, as well as higher security,
transportation, parking and maintenance costs.
Meanwhile, innovation in
college education is virtually nonexistent. The Internet has reduced costs and
improved service across most industries, but has led to little more than an
online syllabus and wired dorm rooms on campuses. College is an information
business, the kind best fitted for the Internet revolution, yet real innovation
is mainly coming from for-profit schools like the University of Phoenix.
Innovation will not come to
public universities until the government stops underwriting inefficiency and
competitive pressures force them to innovate or fail.
The current system will not
last long without major change. Parents and students are reaching their debt
limits, governments are paring support, and new competitors salivate. Zimpher
has a unique opportunity to embrace this challenge and use it as a mandate for
change.
---
Bob Gilbreath, a Hyde Park resident, is a marketing
manager for a Cincinnati manufacturer